Section: Research & Surveys

No Unfair Social Housing Advantage for Migrants

Interim research released by the Equality and Human Rights Commission and the Local Government Association shows no evidence that social housing allocation favours foreign migrants over UK citizens.

The findings are from a report commissioned from the IPPR to help establish whether the allocation system is prone to any systemic bias. The full results will be published later this year.

The report is based on Labour Force Survey data, which gives a 'snapshot' of local authority housing allocation in England and Wales, and a new Local Government Association poll of local authority housing managers.

Neither the qualitative analysis of local authorities' policies, nor the examination of the patterns of tenure, offer any evidence to support the hypothesis that recent migrants are given preferential access to social housing.

Key findings include:

More Climate Change Training Needed

Research commissioned by the Academy for Sustainable Communities (ASC) has found that there needs to be a more co-ordinated approach to delivering climate change training for people who create and maintain communities.

The study found that climate change training is not being set properly within the wider context of sustainable communities. As a result, climate change issues are being addressed as a 'bolt-on' to other sustainable communities issues, rather than underpinning all activities.

ASC intends to work with bodies and networks responsible for professional training to prioritise climate change learning. This will support the emerging eco town teams and other professionals in the wider sector as they plan and build communities that can adapt to a changing climate.

ASC is working on a number of initiatives to support the eco towns programme and help people tackle climate change, including:

The research into climate change training involved 359 survey respondents and interviews with 11 organisations:

The research identified 3 main concerns:

DELIVERING HOUSING IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMMES ON TIME, ON BUDGET WITH QUALITY STANDARDS MET Tribal publishes independent report on the systems that will be vital to deliver £40bn Housing Improvement Programmes effectively by 2010

Effective Delivering of Housing Improvement Programmes

Housing Improvement Programmes worth £40 billion that are due by 2010 will require specialised, integrated information systems in order to hit delivery targets, according to a new survey report from consultants Triba.

The significant level of investment and tight deadlines demand extremely effective management of Housing Improvement Programmes in order for them to deliver in terms of time, budget and quality, according to the report.

The survey found that many housing organisations were not using an effective system to manage all the information for their improvement programmes and, as a result, could be losing time and money.

Key findings of the survey of showed that:

Yet, over 40% said it was difficult or very difficult to track the progress of their programme.

Using the results of the independent survey, Tribal has identified the key requirements that information systems must have so that housing associations can use them to manage and deliver their improvement programmes effectively.

The key finding is that a single, accurate and up to date information source about the delivery of the project is required. This includes:

The housing organisations which have already begun to use this kind of system named its key benefits as:

John Stuttard, Director of Tribal's Information Systems consultancy, said:

"Our job was to identify the crucial criteria for information systems that could be used to help Housing Improvement Programmes deliver on time and on budget whilst meeting their quality standards.

"The survey showed a clear need for purpose-built information systems to manage these sorts of programmes. It also highlighted that staff of housing organisations need to know that having an integrated system to manage all of their information could save them time and money.

"For example, how many housing organisations have paid out unnecessarily for reactive repairs because they did not have the documents that show that the work is still under warranty? These are the sorts of problems we hope to see eliminated with more of these systems being developed and used in the sector."

Mp>The report - Current Approaches to Managing Housing Improvements Programmes - was commissioned by Delcam PS-Team.

KeyFacts

Housing Monthly Diary



Enter your email address to receive our e-newsletters advising on updates to KeyFacts

We will not share your email address with others or use it for any other purpose

Reporting on April 2008

Bookmark and Share

Archive Issues Reporting Periods